|
''R v Rahey'', () 1 S.C.R. 588 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. The accused challenged a delay of over eleven months on an application for a directed verdict as violation of the right to a trial within a reasonable time under section 11(b) of the ''Charter''. The Court found that there was a violation of section 11(b) and granted a stay of proceedings. ==Background== Carl Rahey was charged with filing false tax returns and tax evasion. His assets were put in receivership. His trial began and after the closing of the Crown's argument, in December 1982 the defence applied for a directed verdict. Over a period of nine months the judge delayed issuing a decision. In September 1983, the defence applied to dismiss the charges as a violation of Rahey's right to trial in a reasonable time under section 11(b) of the ''Charter''. The next day the trial judge issued his decision rejecting the application for a directed verdict. The application for dismissal was granted. On appeal the charges were reinstated. There were three issues put to the Supreme Court: #whether the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia was a court of competent jurisdiction for the purposes of an application under s. 24(1) of the Charter; # whether appellant's right to be tried under a reasonable time was infringed; and, if so, # whether the superior court judge properly exercised her jurisdiction in dismissing the charges because of the unreasonable delay of the trial judge. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Rahey」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|